Jones Report

Whispering campaign against General who spoke up against Blair


PNAC chair Bill Kristol confronted on 9/11 - WATCH VIDEO -


Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story

Bill Maher goes after Sheen, 9/11 Truth

Police to fight Anti-Social Behavior with spy planes

Army Chief Says Pull Out of Iraq; 74% Agree

Hawaiians Check for Quake Damage; no deaths yet reported

Man still locked up in AZ after 9/11/01 sweeps; held 5 years without charge

Americans Question Bush on 9/11 Intelligence: poll

"Official" 9/11 Story on Life support

Lost in the Dust of 9/11: Janitors suffering since clean-up

9/11 Scrooge Denying Illness Claims-- Paid $350,000 per year

9/11 Widows Petition Congress to reveal meeting

9/11 Truth and the Left: Zwicker meets Goodman

Next Stone film focusing on U.S. response to bin Laden after 9/11

Two ordered not to discuss Gitmo claims

Lynndie England reveals a culture of warped violence

Students forced to use bathroom in trashcan during lockdown drill

Guantanamo guards 'boast about abuse'

Guantanamo Guards Admit Abuse

Israel Calls for Tough UN Action on 'Demented' Iran

One more victim of thought crime in China

Korea bomb could be sent by sea, analyst warns

China Erects Fence Along North Korea Border

UK Police Chief Hints at Internment

General for Iraq pullout wins Public, Press Support

Questionable Justice in 'Terror Sting' Trial

Intelligence Laundry: to Paris again

Police 'ambushed', stoned by gang in Paris suburb

Bush Keeps Revising War Justification

White House Upbeat About GOP prospects

FOX News Hides Unfavorable Poll Results About Bush and Iraq

Brother of Saddam Prosecutor is Killed

British Airways suspends working for wearing cross

U.S. Agents Question 14 year-old on Anti-Bush MySpace Page

Hamas Threatens to Break Ceasefire After Israeli Air Strikes

Police accuse Israeli President of Rape


9/11 and more at

Britain's top General was the subject of a vicious Whitehall whispering campaign yesterday as Labour ministers furious at his devastating outburst over Iraq called for him to be sacked.

Despite Tony Blair being forced to back General Sir Richard Dannatt publicly on Friday over his blunt assessment of Britain's mission in Iraq, there were growing fears that the head of the Army could yet fall victim to a political backlash.

In behind-the-scenes briefings yesterday senior ministers claimed the General should be dismissed. They condemned his explosive public statements as a 'mistake' which must not be allowed to happen again.

However opinion polls revealed the political risks facing the Government as three quarters of the public said they agreed with Sir Richard and that he should keep his job.

Downing Street was left seething by the senior commander's explosive interview in Friday's Daily Mail, in which the Chief of the General Staff warned that UK troops in Iraq were 'exacerbating the security problems' facing Britain around the world, and must leave 'soon' - driving a coach and horses through Tony Blair's foreign policy.

He condemned planning for the post-war occupation as 'poor', and claimed hopes of creating a liberal democracy in Iraq were 'naive.' Within hours he gave a series of broadcast interviews, prompted by a late-night phone call from Defence Secretary Des Browne.

But rather than apologising he went even further, warning of the risk that the Iraq mission could 'break' the Army. The Prime Minister appeared wrong-footed and outmanoeuvred, and faced with an overwhelming wave of support for Sir Richard from MPs and the armed forces.

Mr Blair was reduced to playing down the schism, agreeing with the General's more palatable comments while trying to ignore the most explosive.

But yesterday brought the first signs of a serious Government backlash, raising grave questions about Sir Richard's future.

One Cabinet minister speaking anonymously to a Sunday newspaper said: 'He should be sacked. His comments were utterly unacceptable for someone in his position.'

Another minister said: 'Dannatt was an accident waiting to happen. He should not be allowed to make another mistake.

'How can we expect our troops to risk their lives in Iraq when their commanding officer is questioning their presence there?'

Former cabinet minister David Blunkett, who remains close to Mr Blair, criticised Sir Richard for 'trying to introduce a new constitutional element' by 'interfering' with the Government's decisions, rather than simply carrying them out.

Another Government source said of Sir Richard: 'It is not his job to criticise Government policy. He needs to get back in his box and shut up. His next mistake will be his last.'

The hostile comments raise real doubts over whether Sir Richard's working relationship with the Government can be patched up. His post as head of the Army has no official time limit. His predecessor General Sir Mike Jackson served for three-and-a-half years, whereas Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, overall head of UK armed forces during the 2003 Iraq invasion, quit after barely two years following a series of run-ins with politicians.

Army insiders now fear Sir Richard's position could become impossible even sooner. There was more measured criticism from some opposition figures yesterday who claimed the General had overstepped the constitutional mark.

Former Liberal Democrat leader and ex-soldier Paddy Ashdown said: 'He may be accurate in what he said, he may be cheered to the echo in the Army, but he certainly shouldn't have said it.

'It's a clear constitutional breach. It opens up a massive division between him and the Government.'

He said military chiefs who opposes Government policy should resign rather than 'blurt out' their disagreements.

Former Tory foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind suggested Sir Richard would receive a 'two strikes' warning, adding: 'What he said was right, but it's not for a general any more than it is for a civil servant to express what are in fact political views.'

He told GMTV's Sunday Programme: 'Serving officers are not, I'm afraid, able to have that kind of freedom.'

Meanwhile in Iraq itself senior officials agreed that British troops should leave sooner rather than later.

A spokesman for the governor Basra Mohammed al Wail said: 'It's true they saved us from Saddam Hussein, but that war is over. We believe their continuing presence makes the security situation worse.'

In Afghanistan there were growing signs of the shortages Sir Richard referred to, as officials admitted the MOD was looking to charter civilian helicopters to ease the strain on the force of just eight Chinook transport helicopters currently trying to support 5,600 British soldiers on the ground.

In theory the civilian aircraft would be used for routine supply movements and kept away from the 'frontline', although in reality aircraft face risk of attack virtually anywhere in Afghanistan.

Get TERRORSTORM Before the History of Government-Sponsored Terrorism Catches Up With You.


Get Terrorstorm on DVD

See a Scanner Darkly

Visit the Infowars Store

Join Prison