Jones Report
 

Security at airports 'increases risk of terror'

 

PNAC chair Bill Kristol confronted on 9/11 - WATCH VIDEO -

OTHER NEWS
__________

South Park equates 9/11 Truth w/ Anti-Semitism, Numerology & Cartman

Kim Jong who? North Korea what? Neocons playing down threat

Bounty set for indicted American al Qaeda

GOP Political consultant sentenced; imprisoned students in home

Bush in denial; Zogby Pollster '95 percent' sure of 650,000 Iraqi Deaths

Bush spars with reporters on Iraq, North Korea

Al Qaeda Suspect: U.S. Gov't Gave Me LSD

Nuremberg-style Trials Proposd for Global Warming Skeptics

The Trial of Hamid and Umer Hayat: Terror or Entrapment?

'North Korea Will Test H-Bomb'

North Korea Threatens Nuclear War Against U.S.

Mayor Daley: cameras on 'almost every street' by 2016

Technology the boss uses to spy on you

Group sues for info on electronic surveillance tools

More than 50 Illegal Immigrants found in 'stash house'

Rep. Shays Defends Foley: At Least No One Died

Michael Savage: Albright "should be hung" for role in North Korea

Copy Cats Too Costly; Cloning Company Closes

Get TERRORSTORM on DVD now

9/11 and more at PrisonPlanet.tv

Barrie Clement / London Independent | October 11 2006

A world authority on terrorism yesterday tore into security at Britain's biggest airport arguing that the authorities had created new targets for extremists.

Threats from mortars, missiles and devices placed in cars near airports were a more realistic danger than on-board bombs, according to Professor Alan Hatcher.

He said the queues up to 300-strong in lines that coil around each other because of well-meaning security practices had themselves become targets.

"A well-placed suitcase containing several kilograms of explosive ... would result in catastrophic fatalities and injuries as well as potentially destroying the infrastructure of the building," Professor Hatcher told the Commons Transport Committee in a written submission.

He said there should be less reliance on hi-tech responses and more support given to security staff. Professor Hatcher, principal of the International School For Security and Explosives Education, said that such workers were often paid "very poorly" and had no career path. Often there was a very high turnover of staff. In his memorandum to the committee, the professor said security and communications were fragmented, staff poorly supervised and trained and there was a perceived lack of "customer relationship skills".
He said there was a strong case for checking baggage before passengers entered terminal buildings as at Changi airport in Singapore. The committee is investigating the response to the 10 August security scare involving an alleged plot to bring down transatlantic airliners.

The professor called for rigorous checking procedures around the perimeter of Heathrow, in particular to counter a potential threat from mortar bombs.

He said cars should be parked away from airports and passengers transported via coaches or trains. He argued that Terminal 3 at Heathrow was a " very easy target" for a simple terrorist attack. "Even a small device would result in large-scale loss of life," he said.

Michael Todd, the chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, agreed that security measures were concentrated in controlled zones after passengers had been searched, even though the area of vulnerability at airports was external. "You won't bring down an aircraft, but actually you could disrupt an airport very, very easily through an attack outside or certainly you can attack confidence," he said.

Get TERRORSTORM Before the History of Government-Sponsored Terrorism Catches Up With You.

CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BUY TERRORSTORM IN HARD COPY

Get Terrorstorm on DVD

See a Scanner Darkly

Visit the Infowars Store

Join Prison Planet.tv