Freedom to Fascism

 
Jones Report
 

GOP Making Harrassing Calls To Voters

 

Parties Crank Up Voter Turnout Efforts

OTHER NEWS
__________

The Voting Machine Doc Diebold Didn't Want You to See....

Perle: I only agreed to tell the truth on Iraq if 'Not published before election'

Saddam Verdict Date 'Rigged' for Bush

New Law Requires Approval for Americans to Leave Country

Cheating Possible on Vote Machine

Ohio Absentee Ballots Scanned Early

Vanity Fair: Neo Culpa

Pastor Haggard Admits Sex 'Immorality'

Tony Snow Denies Saddam Trial 'Scheming'

Bush Administration: Ex-CIA Prisoner Shouldn't Speak to Attorney

Army Recruiters Accused Of Misleading Students Into Enlisting

Top Ten Neocon Tricks for a November Surprise

Al Qaeda Briton 'Plotted to Kill Thousands'

New Docs Show 1999 U.S. War Game Predicting Iraq Disaster

Ortega Poised to Retake Nicaragua

Aldous Huxley: The Ultimate Revolution, March 20, 1962

'Orwell Rolls in His Grave' over Media Concentration

Spies Cover up Diana 'Murder'

Cheney to Spend Election Day with Daughter...Hunting

Blair Defends Identity Card Plan

IRAN'S DISPLAY OF POWER TO DETER US WAR PLANS

Chinese Man Arrested for Ridiculing a Government Official in a Text Message

Get TERRORSTORM on DVD now

9/11 and more at PrisonPlanet.tv

Josh Marshall/ Talking Points | November 6, 2006

A number of readers have written in to ask what if any effective response there is to these robocalls we've been writing about.

First, let's address our definitions. Automated political campaign calls are a staple of modern politics. Both sides put in millions of them every election year. That's because they're very cheap, fairly effective and they get less scrutiny than 'public' ads on tv and radio.

To the extent that's what we're talking about, there's nothing 'to do' about them any more than there is anything to do about nasty or unfair 30 second tv spots.

What we're talking about is something a bit different. What we're seeing is an apparent coordinated effort from the NRCC -- the House GOP committee -- to place calls that appear to be from the local Democratic candidate and then automatically call the same number back as many as seven or eight times each time the caller hang-ups. If the caller listens to the whole message it goes on to bash the Democratic candidate. But if the caller hangs up prematurely, the computer calls right back. Hang-ups are the achilles heal of robo-calls. So this seems to be an attempt to cover for that weakness by making those who hang up think the Democratic candidate is basically harassing them with phone calls. The GOP wins either way.

What is there to do about it. As described, the calls appear to be in violation of federal regulations which mandate that these calls clearly identify their origin. The repetitive call back may also be a violation in different states. The New Hampshire AG apparently just intervened to force the NRCC to stop the calls in that state. But frankly, none of that matters. Because the folks placing the calls factor in the price of whatever fines might be meted out after the election when the damage is already done.

Truthfully, I don't think there's really much to do but publicize it and then get out and vote.

A lot of these races remain inside the MOE, the margin of error. And that means the MOT, the margin of theft. If Dems want to pick up seats on Tuesday they'll have to get a lot of these races out of the MOT. Because as long as they're inside, the Republicans can still grab them with a mix of voter suppression, dirty tricks and election fraud.

Get TERRORSTORM Before the History of Government-Sponsored Terrorism Catches Up With You.

CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BUY TERRORSTORM IN HARD COPY

Get Terrorstorm on DVD

See a Scanner Darkly

Visit the Infowars Store

Join Prison Planet.tv