Jones Report
 

Pre-emptive lawsuit challenges Bush plan

 

OTHER NEWS
__________

Schwarzenegger vetoes RFID privacy bill to make way for Real ID

Bush organizing school violence summit

Senator Frist: Taliban should be in Afghan govt

Will Americans Seek Repeal of Constitution-Killing 'Enabling Act'?

Fatal Vision - Deeper Evil Behind The Detainee Bill

5 Girls Dead in Amish School Shooting

Assassin and his 20-year grudge against girls

Police: Cameras not helping to fight D.C. crime

Hitachi RFID tag to track building occupants

High school adds cameras to metal detectors, guards and city cops

Drones expected to be new eye in hurricanes

Paraplegic man allegedly roughed up by police

Clues sought in Atta video

U.S. Congress gets first look at Organ Harvesting allegations

Rumsfeld: Venezuela's Weapons a Concern

Fox May Use Force to End Oaxaca Protests

North Korea announces a nuclear test

Wounded British soldiers 'get appalling health care'

Pope Linked to "Child Abuse Cover-up": Doc

Biden wanted Cheney out

Multitude of French Smokers Fume With Advent of Public Ban

Turkish plane seized in 'non aggressive' hijacking

Thwarted Georgia Coup?

Riddle of 'Frightening' Breast Cancer Epidemic

Miami Herald publisher resigns; journalists paid to be pro-Cuban democracy

Get TERRORSTORM on DVD now

9/11 and more at PrisonPlanet.tv

MATT APUZZO, Associated Press | October 3 2006

WASHINGTON - Attorneys for 25 men being held in Afghanistan launched a pre-emptive strike Monday against President Bush's plan to prosecute and interrogate terror suspects.

Court documents filed Monday demand that the men be released or charged and allowed to meet with attorneys. Such a filing, known as a habeas corpus petition, is prohibited under the legislation approved by Congress last week.

That bill says the military may detain enemy combatants indefinitely and, if officials choose to bring charges, the cases would be heard before a military commission, not a civilian judge.

Bush has not signed the bill but expects to soon. Supporters say it's a necessary tool in the war on terrorism.

Monday's filing initiates what is likely to be a drawn-out legal fight similar to the one over detainees at a military prison in Guantanamo Bay. Detainees there have dozens of petitions pending.

In civilian courts, the government is required to tell people why they are being held and allow them access to attorneys. People accused of crimes are then afforded speedy trials before juries of their peers.

"With the move that Congress made, the capitulation it made to the president, those rights are in danger of being curtailed," said Vincent Warren, executive director for the Center for Constitutional Rights, which filed the lawsuit.

The new law protects detainees from blatant abuses such as torture but does not require that they be granted legal counsel. It also allows prosecutors to use evidence, such as hearsay, that wouldn't be allowed in civilian courts.

Though the petition was filed before the bill was signed, the law was written retroactively, so a judge would have to strike down at least some of the law in order for the detainees represented by the center to prevail.

The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, who, in a Guantanamo Bay case last year, ruled that Congress had authorized the president to order the detention of "enemy combatants" for the duration of the war on terror. Leon did not set a hearing date in the new case.

The detainees named in the case are being held at Bagram Air Base north of Kabul, Afghanistan, according to court papers.

Get TERRORSTORM Before the History of Government-Sponsored Terrorism Catches Up With You.

CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BUY TERRORSTORM IN HARD COPY

Get Terrorstorm on DVD

See a Scanner Darkly

Visit the Infowars Store

Join Prison Planet.tv